Login / Signup

Give us your ideas on how we can create our Open Government Plan.

Sign Up & Share Ideas Discuss & Vote on Ideas

« Back To OpenState
Clear benchmarks on Sudan
The State Department has not publicly disclosed the precise benchmarks it is applying to assess progress in Sudan. The outcome of the first quarterly review of the U.S. Sudan policy by the National Security Council Deputies Committee was undisclosed. In Sudan, tensions are high with the April national elections and January 2011 referendum on independence for southern Sudan rapidly approaching. I strongly encourage the State Department to bring transparency to the process by which the United States will strictly adhere to unambiguous benchmarks and ensure that the appropriate pressures and incentives are applied according.
Comments
Randy 1 month ago
I agree with Susan's position on the benchmarks. I understand there is some sensitivity around the benchmarks. However, there's no window into whether the benchmarks exist and if State is actually applying them.
Gabriel 1 month ago
I strongly agree. There are clear signs of danger for the immediate future of Sudan, while we hear mostly positive pronouncements from Special Envoy Gration. What will trigger pressures? Will we again wait until after great human loss occurs for us to then respond with statements of condemnation and regret?
melnel1 1 month ago
The appointment of full time envoy Gration was great news back in 3/09. When the policy review was finally released in 10/09 the overall sense of "urgency" was palpable with a message of "verify then trust". Since that time I struggle to see where the milestones of CPA implementation are? There is no total picture of progress with verifiable objectives and "benchmarks" is only a term that's been batted around. Have there been verifiable changes on the ground in Darfur, in South Sudan leading up to the elections? Have we earnestly engaged in multilateralizing the agenda of the policy? Are we legitimizing a corrupt and genocidal regime? Are the deptuties charged with recommending or only reviewing? Will the "benchmarks" be articulated so we can see what the incentives and disincentives are?
Related Topics/Ideas
Title

Idea Rank : 1
Share
RSS 
  • Users Tracking (5)